Showing posts with label media coverage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label media coverage. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 12, 2013

Guardian Journalist Glenn Greenwald Unloads On The Liberal Press



Glenn Greenwald: 'Slavishly Partisan' Democrats In The Media Are Cheerleading Policies They Used To Hate -- Brett LoGiurato, Business Insider

New revelations about the National Security Agency's surveillance programs have divided members of Congress and of the media apart from the normal partisan split.

One person who isn't surprised about the lack of Democrats and liberals in the media challenging the Obama administration, however, is the man who has broken multiple stories based off leaks from former NSA contractor Edward Snowden — Guardian journalist Glenn Greenwald.

Greenwald told Business Insider late Tuesday night that he thinks some left-leaning members of the media — such as Time magazine's Joe Klein and The New Yorker's Jeffrey Toobin — have shifted stances on surveillance and civil liberties for "principle-free, hackish, and opportunistic" reasons.

Read more ....

My Comment: Not everyone in the main stream media are that "slavishly partisan" .... but he is right .... many in the media are pursuing and promoting their political beliefs/agenda than covering and researching the news.

Why The Western Media Cannot Be Trusted On Syria



Three Reasons Why You Can't Trust The Western Media On Syria -- Rodger Shanahan, ABC News (Australia)

Many of us feel a stake in the Syrian civil war, and are appalled by the daily violence reported through our domestic news channels. But is our media really explaining the conflict to us, or are we as ill-informed and misguided as before the war started? Rodger Shanahan from the Lowy Institute investigates.


There have been many notable failings in the Western media's coverage of Syria over the last few years. While Joan Juliet Buck's hagiography of Asma al-Assad for US Vogue ('A Rose in the Desert') probably tops the list, how good is the rest of our news?

We hear reports on the conflict happening in Syria almost everyday. While we might think we are engaged with what’s happening, are we really able to take informed action on the basis of what's reported?

The answer is realistically 'No'.

Read more ....

My Comment: One of the reasons why I started this blog was because I did not trust what I was reading .... hence I started this blog that aggregates the news from different sources on specific stories. And while the world's news agencies do have a certain uniformity in their coverage .... there are some differences (or greater coverage) on some issues.

Monday, June 10, 2013

NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden First Approached The Washington Post To Publish His Leaks But The Post Declined

Snowden took his information to Guardian journalist Glenn Greenwald (pictured) when the Post would not comply with some of his demands

NSA Whistleblower First Approached The Washington Post With His Leaks But The Newspaper Refused To Comply With His Publishing Demands -- Daily Mail

* NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden first approached the Post in early May
* Sometime during the week of May 20, Snowden requested that the Post publish in full within 72 hours a PowerPoint slide on the NSA Internet data collection program dubbed PRISM
* The Post refused to meet his demands so Snowden took his information to the Guardian's Glenn Greenwald
* Greenwald broke the story on NSA call surveillance late last Wednesday
* The Post broke its story on PRISM the next day

The former intelligence worker who was the source of bombshell stories on top secret government snooping programs first approached the Washington Post with his trove of information in early May, the Post's Barton Gellman has reported.

But the Post refused to fulfill some of Edward Snowden's specific requests, so Snowden took his information to The Guardian's Glenn Greenwald, who then became the first to publish a story on the leaks.

Read more ....

My Comment: The Washington Post got cold feet .... blaming Edward Snowden's demands for missing on what is without question the biggest intelligence leak since the leak of the Pentagon papers by Daniel Ellsberg in 1971.

How 'The Guardian' Got The NSA Surveillance Scoop

Guardian Makes Waves, And Is Ready For More -- New York Times

When Janine Gibson, the editor in chief of The Guardian’s Web site in the United States, realized that one of her columnists had a scoop about secret National Security Agency surveillance — potentially one of the biggest leaks in American intelligence history — she presented it to The Guardian’s top editor in London with classic British understatement.

“I’ve got a little story to chat to you about,” she told the editor, Alan Rusbridger.

Last week’s revelations about the extent of N.S.A. surveillance both in the United States and abroad is a major coup for the British news organization, which established a beachhead here less than two years ago. Mr. Rusbridger, who flew to New York from London last Wednesday in anticipation of the scoop, credits the story to the fact that The Guardian continues to invest in journalism when many news organization have cut back.

Read more ....

My Comment: It should be noted that the Washington Post was the first to have this exclusive .... but they declined to publish it.The Washington Post is blaming Edward Snowden's demands for the reason why they backed out .... but I am not convinced. I suspect that the Washington Post actually did know the significance of this leak .... but they were looking at it from a different angle .... i.e. how will reporting the leak impact the paper, the legal consequences, and will disclosing it change it's close relationship with the White House. The Guardian took a different route .... they saw the leak for what it was (a big scoop), and they jumped on it. As a result .... everyone is reading The Guardian .... and the Washington Post is now playing catch-up.

Update: Barton Gellman, Glenn Greenwald feud over NSA leaker -- Politico

Is The Press Using White House 'Talking Points' To Explain The NSA Surveillance Program


Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
Watch the clip below, via MSNBC (Greenwald's interview starts about two minutes in)

Glenn Greenwald Gets 'Testy' With 'Morning Joe's' Mika Brzezinski -- Business Insider 

 "Morning Joe" co-host Mike Brzezinski sparred Monday morning with Guardian journalist Glenn Greenwald, who has broken a series of stories detailing a broad swath of government surveillance by the National Security Agency.

 Brzezinski repeatedly challenged Greenwald on whether the programs his reporting has detailed — including NSA data-mining and phone surveillance programs — were really "shocking."

 In one heated moment, Brzezinski asked Greenwald if the Obama administration was doing anything illegal.

Read more ....  

My Comment: I am not a fan of Glenn Greenwald, but he has been spot on in this story. His exchange with Mika Brzezinski starting at the 9:25 mark in the above video is priceless. The U.S. press is behind in their coverage on this story .... and as I have said before the go-to place for coverage on this NSA story is the British press .... specifically the Guardian.

Thursday, June 6, 2013

Why Has The U.S. Media Fail To Break Even One Of Four Obama Scandals?


Mainstream Media Fail To Break Even One Of Four Obama Scandals -- Breitbart

Well, if it is Thursday, there must be a new Obama scandal. But one thing is for damn sure, whatever that scandal is, you can bet the American mainstream media will be playing catch up and not carrying the glory of breaking a story about a major White House scandal.

Fact: Over the past few weeks, four major scandals have broken over the Obama administration, and it is a very sad (and frightening) truth that our pathetic, American, lapdog mainstream media is not responsible for breaking even a single one.

Read more ....

My Comment: One of the reasons why I started this blog was my dissatisfaction on the mainstream media in covering defense/war/intelligence stories. The fact that they have also failed in covering this administration and the scandals that now plague it does not surprise me. All that I can say is thank God for the internet, alternative media, social media, and those who are risking a lot in exposing programs and policies that the government and their media supporters do not want disclosed.

Update #1: I thought President Obama said that the war on terror was over .... so why the NSA surveillance?
Update #2: It has been hilarious watching the main stream media this morning .... they have been scooped by the British media on the NSA story, and in turn they have also been shown how utterly corrupt they are in covering this White House and it's policies. Their response has been predictable and .... sadly .... very revealing. In short .... it's all Bush's fault. Sighhhh .... they just cannot accept that this is who President Obama is. I guess they never will.
Update #3: A few weeks ago when the AP scandal broke I posted that this was just the tip of the iceberg. Here is another easy prediction .... this is still just the tip of the iceberg. Expect more scandals and revelations in the weeks and months to come.

Wednesday, May 29, 2013

AP CEO: U.S. Justice Department Monitored Thousands And Thousands Of Phone Calls By Reporters



AP CEO Says DOJ Seized Records For 'Thousands And Thousands' Of Phone Calls: Staffer -- Michael Calderone, Huffington post

NEW YORK -- Associated Press president and chief executive Gary Pruitt told staff at a Wednesday town hall meeting that the phone records obtained by the government included "thousands and thousands" of calls in and out of the news organization, according to a staffer who attended.

The AP revealed on May 13 that the Justice Department had seized records for 20 separate phone lines over a two-month period as part of a leak investigation, but has not mentioned how many calls may have been affected.

Read more ....

My Comment: The above video is from two weeks ago. As for today's comments by AP CEO Gary Pruitt, only RT is carrying it (so far). I mentioned two weeks ago that my gut was telling me that this was probably the tip of the iceberg .... today's AP CEO Gary Pruitt's comments now confirm this. This is very disturbing news, and I expect even more information on how extensive this monitoring was to become unveiled in the next few days.

Update: Many in the mainstream media are starting to get upset with this White House .... as they should be. But the man who is ultimately responsible for this leak probe .... and has made no apologies about it .... is still being given a free pass by the press. When President Obama is not being given this 'free pass' is when I will start to believe that the Washington Press corp is getting serious about this scandal and others .... until then .... this is all for show.

Wednesday, May 22, 2013

What Foreign Correspondents And Human Rights Activists Believe In

Vultures -- Washington Free Beacon

AP, AFP reporters trash Israel in secret Facebook group.

A “secret” Facebook group of foreign correspondents and human rights activists quickly devolved into an anti-Israel hate-fest on Tuesday following the release of a new Israeli government report that cleared the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) of wrongdoing in the 2000 death of a Palestinian boy.

The Israeli government report contests the claim that the IDF killed a Palestinian boy, Muhammad al-Durrah, in a famous 2000 incident in Gaza that helped ignite the Second Intifada.

Journalists and activists mocked the report, attacked the IDF, and claimed pro-Israel lobbyists were influencing the media coverage, in a private Facebook group for foreign correspondents known as the “Vulture Club.”

Read more ....

My Comment: Bias in the media .... nah ....

Tuesday, May 14, 2013

Citing National Security, US Attorney General Holder Defends Justice Department's Seizure Of AP Phone Records



US Attorney General Defends AP Seizure Citing Major Security Threat To Public -- The Guardian

Eric Holder says story related to subpoena of phone records was 'very, very serious' while Obama faces scrutiny on press rights

The US attorney general, Eric Holder, has defended the Obama administration's controversial seizure of phone records from the Associated Press, saying that a story run by the news organisation had posed a major security threat to the American public.

Holder, speaking at a press conference at the Department of Justice on Tuesday, said an AP story published last year about an alleged Yemeni terrorist plot to blow up a US plane was the result of "a very, very serious leak" that justified "very aggressive action".

Read more ....

More News On US Attorney General Holder Defending The Justice Department's Seizure Of AP Phone Records

Justice official defends AP phone records subpoenas -- CNN
Eric Holder blasts IRS scandal, defends seizure of Associated Press phone records -- New York Daily News
US defends seizure of reporters' phone logs -- AFP
US Attorney General Defends Leak Probe -- Voice of America
Attorney General Holder pleads ignorance on AP snooping scandal, defends record on civil liberties -- Washington Times
Holder says leak prompting AP subpoena was very serious -- Reuters
Eric Holder says leak to AP was 'very serious' -- BBC
DOJ: Government Exhausted Other Efforts Before Issuing Subpoena for AP Phone Records -- Wall Street Journal
Holder: I wasn't involved in AP secret phone probe -- CBS/AP
Attorney General Holder recused himself from media subpoena -- Reuters
Holder recused himself from leak investigation, Justice Department says -- Washington Post

My Comment:
Would the media have reacted the same way if someone like President George Bush did this under his watch .... I doubt it. As a consequence .... the media's lack of outrage on the AP story is disturbing for the simple reason that it now sets a precedent for future leak investigations .... and how the government will conduct itself.

Monday, May 13, 2013

U.S. Justice Department Seizes AP Journalists' Phone Records -- News Roundup

Associated Press Says U.S. Government Seized Journalists' Phone Records -- Reuters

(Reuters) - The Associated Press on Monday said the U.S. government secretly seized telephone records of AP offices and reporters for a two-month period in 2012, describing the acts as a "massive and unprecedented intrusion" into news-gathering operations.

AP Chief Executive Gary Pruitt, in a letter posted on the agency's website, said the AP was informed last Friday that the Justice Department gathered records for more than 20 phone lines assigned to the agency and its reporters.

"There can be no possible justification for such an overbroad collection of the telephone communications of The Associated Press and its reporters," Pruitt said in the letter, which was addressed to Attorney General Eric Holder.

An AP story on the records seizure said the government would not say why it sought the records.

Read more ...

More News On AP's Report That The U.S. Government Seized Journalists' Phone Records

Gov't obtains wide AP phone records in probe -- AP
AP to Eric Holder: 'No Possible Justification' for Phone Record Seizure -- US News and World Report
Justice subpoenaed AP phone records, news service says -- CNN
U.S. Obtains Wide AP Phone Records in Probe -- Wall Street Journal
News agency protests US seizure of phone records -- AFP
Justice Department secretly obtained AP telephone records -- L.A. Times
Justice Dept. secretly seized AP reporters’ phone records -- The Hill
US Justice Department secretly seizes Associated Press phone records -- The Telegraph
Report: DoJ Secretly Collected Two Months of AP Phone Records -- FOX News
AP: Government subpoenaed journalists’ phone records -- Washington Post
AP complains of ‘massive and unprecedented intrusion’ by DOJ into reporters’ phone records -- ABA Journal
Obama Administration Secretly Obtains Phone Records of AP Journalists -- Wired
AP: Justice Dept monitored phone calls in 'unprecedented intrusion' -- Global Post
'UNPRECEDENTED INTRUSION': Justice Department Secretly Obtains Months Of AP Reporter Phone Records -- Business Insider
The Department of Justice Secretly Spied on the Associated Press -- Motherboard
Here's The Justice Department's Statement On Obtaining Months Of Phone Records From The AP -- Business Insider
The Justice Department Secretly Seized AP Phone Records — on a Terror Leak? -- Philip Bump, The Atlantic

Update #1: This is apparently the reason why AP's phone records were seized.
Update #2: This is a story with international implications. Even Russian News (RT) is reporting on it. If I am an AP reporter right now, I will be furious .... and scared. No one .... I repeat .... no one is going to confide in AP (the world's largest news wire service) on any story right now knowing that the US Justice Department may be listening in.

Breaking News Story: US Government Seizes AP's Phone Records

Govt Obtains Wide AP Phone Records In Probe -- AP

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Justice Department secretly obtained two months of telephone records of reporters and editors for The Associated Press in what the news cooperative's top executive called a "massive and unprecedented intrusion" into how news organizations gather the news.

The records obtained by the Justice Department listed outgoing calls for the work and personal phone numbers of individual reporters, general AP office numbers in New York, Washington and Hartford, Conn., and the main number for AP reporters in the House of Representatives press gallery, according to attorneys for the AP. It was not clear if the records also included incoming calls or the duration of calls.

Read more ....

My Comment: This should send a chill up the spine for every journalist. I will be updating this story later tonight.

Update 18:08 EST: If true .... and it looks like it is .... this is an unbelievable story. Benghazi, IRS politically targeted investigations, Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius' solicitation of Obamacare outreach funds, and .... God knows what else is out there. I am not an American .... just someone outside looking in .... but this is a sad reflection of the current state of affairs in the U.S..

Thursday, April 18, 2013

Media Shows No Contrition For Their Blunders On Covering The Boston Marathon Bombing

 

Media Shrug At Boston Blunders -- Politico 

The inaccurate report by CNN and other news organizations about an arrest in the Boston bombing case was arguably one of the most flagrant errors on a story of major national consequence in years.

When the news organizations later corrected their mistakes, there seemed to be something missing — any big shows of contrition, or even a sense of the magnitude of the error.

It fell to Twitter and the merciless mockery of Jon Stewart, who devoted much of “The Daily Show” to skewering CNN’s John King, to call out the media for their failures.

 In an earlier era, many news veterans told POLITICO, a wrong report on a story the whole world was watching would have produced major repercussions — groveling apologies from reporters and editors, journalism seminars on the dangers of letting rumor outpace fact, and maybe even a few firings at the outlets involved.

Read more ....

My Comment: Kudos to Jon Stewart and his mocking of the media .... but that unfortunately is the state of the media today.

Wednesday, April 17, 2013

F.B.I. Criticizes News Media On Boston Marathon Bombing Coverage

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) agents arrive at the scene after explosions near the finish line of the Boston Marathon in Boston, Massachusetts April 15, 2013. REUTERS/Neal Hamberg

F.B.I. Criticizes News Media for False Reports Of An Arrest In The Boston Bombing -- New York Times

The F.B.I. scolded several news media outlets on Wednesday for mistakenly reporting that an arrest had been made in the Boston Marathon bombing case, and warned that such unverified reporting could have “unintended consequences” for its investigation.

Numerous organizations, including The Associated Press, The Boston Globe and several local Boston television stations, erroneously reported Wednesday afternoon that an arrest had been made, citing unnamed law enforcement sources. Two of the most prominent reports came from CNN and the Fox News Channel, both the subject of widespread criticism last June after misreporting the result of the Supreme Court ruling on President Obama’s health care overhaul law.

CNN and Fox News spent about an hour discussing the news of an arrest with various correspondents and experts before backing off when they received further information.

Read more ....

My Comment:
The FBI has a point. I followed and posted what CNN/AP/FOX News were reporting Wednesday afternoon .... and it was all BS. This report is more credible .... the FBI is reporting that they are looking for two persons of interest ... and what is not surprising is that the FBI has made it very clear that they are not going to share these photos with the media.

How The World Reported The Boston Marathon Bombings


How The Rest Of The World Is Watching The Wake Of Boston -- Atlantic Wire

In the Muslim world there were concerns about who might be blamed; in Britain thoughts turned to their own marathon set to take place Sunday. In its aftermath, the Boston Marathon bombings became a global news story, appearing on front pages in places ranging from Argentina to Turkey.

Max Fisher of the Washington Post reported Monday afternoon on the fear that spread throughout the Muslim world that a potential bomber might turn out to be someone who practiced the same faith. He pointed attention to Jenan Moussa, a reporter for Al Aan TV based in Dubai. Moussa tweeted: "The thought of every Muslim right now. RT @LibyaLiberty Please don't be a Muslim. #BostonMarathon." This morning Moussa retweeted words of condolence from a Muslim cleric saying, "We need more of these voices."

Read more ....

My Comment: I found the international coverage to be very fair and accurate. Because of this blog I read and follow approximately two to three dozen international news sources, and about two to three dozen blogs .... and all of them understood that this was an act of terrorism done by terrorists.

Monday, February 25, 2013

Former White House Press Secretary Was Ordered (To Lie) To Deny The Existance Of America's Drone Program



Robert Gibbs: As Press Secretary, I Was Ordered Not To Acknowledge The Existence Of The Drone Program -- Washington Examiner

During a discussion about President Obama’s lack of transparency about the drone program, former White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs explained on MSNBC this morning that he was ordered to never acknowledge the existence of the drone program.

“One of the first things they told me was, you are not even to acknowledge the drone program, you are not even to discuss that it exists,” Gibbs said frankly, explaining why he could never be forthcoming about the issue with White House reporters.

Read more ....

More News On Former White House Secretary Gibbs Acknowledging That he Was Told To Not Reveal The U.S. Drone program To The Press

Robert Gibbs: I was told ‘not even to acknowledge the drone program’
-- MSNBC
Former press secretary Robert Gibbs 'was told by the White House not to acknowledge drone program and DENY it even existed' -- Daily Mail
Former White House press secretary Robert Gibbs: I had gag order on drone program -- CBS
Robert Gibbs Told Not To Acknowledge Drone Program Exists As White House Press Secretary -- Huffington Post
Gibbs: I was ordered not to acknowledge drone program existed -- The Hill
Former White House Press Secretary: Treating Drones Like a Secret Is 'Inherently Crazy' -- The Atlantic
Gibbs: Not W.H.'s job to lift up the press corps -- Josh Gerstein, The Politico



Monday, February 18, 2013

White House Press Corp In Open Rebellion

 

Obama, The Puppet Master -- Politico 

President Barack Obama is a master at limiting, shaping and manipulating media coverage of himself and his White House.

Not for the reason that conservatives suspect: namely, that a liberal press willingly and eagerly allows itself to get manipulated. Instead, the mastery mostly flows from a White House that has taken old tricks for shaping coverage (staged leaks, friendly interviews) and put them on steroids using new ones (social media, content creation, precision targeting). And it’s an equal opportunity strategy: Media across the ideological spectrum are left scrambling for access.

The results are transformational. With more technology, and fewer resources at many media companies, the balance of power between the White House and press has tipped unmistakably toward the government. This is an arguably dangerous development, and one that the Obama White House — fluent in digital media and no fan of the mainstream press — has exploited cleverly and ruthlessly. And future presidents from both parties will undoubtedly copy and expand on this approach.

Read more ....  

My Comment: The media's complaints are comical. It took them almost 5 years to figure this all out ?!?!?! .... I figured it out when he was running in the primaries in 2008.

U.S. Media Frustrated Over Lack Of Access To President Obama

Press Corps Expresses ‘Frustration’ Over Lack Of Access To Obama -- The Hill

The White House press corps on Sunday expressed frustration with the lack of access given to President Obama this weekend, during his trip to Florida.

White House Correspondents Association President Ed Henry released a statement Sunday evening, saying that the press corps had not been given adequate access to the president and that the group would press for “transparency” in the future, according to a pool report.

"Speaking on behalf of the White House Correspondents Association, I can say a broad cross section of our members from print, radio, online and TV have today expressed extreme frustration to me about having absolutely no access to the President of the United States this entire weekend,” said Henry. “There is a very simple but important principle we will continue to fight for today and in the days ahead: transparency."

Read more
....

Update:
W.H. press corps: 'Extreme frustration' over 'having absolutely no access' to Obama -- Politico

My Comment: If you were spending the weekend with Tiger Woods .... would you want the Press Corps to be hanging around?

Thursday, February 7, 2013

Is The White House Telling The New York Times And The Washington Post What Stories To Publish When It Comes To Drones?

US Newspapers Accused Of Complicity As Drone Report Reopens Security Debate -- Karen McVeigh, The Guardian

New York Times and Washington Post knew about secret drone base in Saudi Arabia but agreed not to disclose it to the public.

US news organisations are facing accusations of complicity after it emerged that they bowed to pressure from the Obama administration not to disclose the existence of a secret drone base in Saudi Arabia despite knowing about it for a year.

Amid renewed scrutiny over the Obama administration's secrecy over its targeted killing programme, media analysts and national security experts said the revelation that some newspapers had co-operated over the drone base had reopened the debate over the balance between freedom of information and national security.

Read more ....

More News On The U.S. Media's Role In Keeping The Secret That There Was A U.S. Drone Base In Saudi Arabia

US media kept Saudi drone base secret for two years
-- The Telegraph
Newspapers defend sitting on, publishing U.S. drone stories -- Washington Times
US media shines spotlight on self over drone secrets -- Global Post/AFP
New York Times broke ‘informal arrangement’ on drones -- Erik Wemple, Washington Post
“State-run propaganda”: Why does the press protect drone secrecy? -- David Sirota, Salon
Why the New York Times Outed a Secret U.S. Drone Base Now -- Joe Coscarelli, New York Magazine
Drone Base Blackout: Is The New York Times Too Cozy With The Obama Administration? -- Ellen Killoran, IBTimes

My Comment:
Glenn Greenwald has even more on this story. What's my take .... I have always been skeptical on what the main stream media decides to report .... especially when it comes to this administration. This now only confirms my opinion.

Thursday, January 31, 2013

Has China Declared A Cyberwar Against The New York Times?

A Cyberattack From China: TimesCast: Chinese hackers infiltrated The New York Times’s computer systems, getting passwords for its reporters and others.

Hackers in China Attacked The Times for Last 4 Months -- New York Times

SAN FRANCISCO — For the last four months, Chinese hackers have persistently attacked The New York Times, infiltrating its computer systems and getting passwords for its reporters and other employees.

After surreptitiously tracking the intruders to study their movements and help erect better defenses to block them, The Times and computer security experts have expelled the attackers and kept them from breaking back in.

The timing of the attacks coincided with the reporting for a Times investigation, published online on Oct. 25, that found that the relatives of Wen Jiabao, China’s prime minister, had accumulated a fortune worth several billion dollars through business dealings.

Read more ....

My Comment: The New York Times (and other media outlets) better get use to such attacks .... the web is an important source of revenues for these media outlets, and those who may not appreciate the coverage that they receive (i.e. North Korea, China, Iran, etc.) may as retribution start targeting these web properties and services.

Sunday, January 6, 2013

Will The Press Ever Give Obama Tough Coverage?


The Four-Year Honeymoon: Will The Press Ever Give Obama Tough Coverage? -- Fred Barnes, Weekly Standard

President Obama never disappoints. When the monthly unemployment rate fails to drop, forget it. What’s important is the number of jobs created. But when the rate actually does drop, forget the growth (or lack of it) in jobs. It’s the rate that matters. And don’t blame Obama for the persistence of slow economic growth and high joblessness. That’s the “new normal.” As for the millions of dropouts from the job market, that’s no big deal, hardly worth more than a passing mention.

Full credit is due Obama for his role in the overthrow of Libyan dictator Muammar Qaddafi. He was cleverly “leading from behind.” But the killing of the American ambassador to Libya and three others in Benghazi—the president bears no responsibility for that. Perish the thought.

Read more ....

My Comment:
For the moment .... no. Ideologically .... much of the press and the President are on the same 'progressive' page .... hence the free pass, excuses, and ignoring negative news. But .... and here is my prediction .... if the economy goes south and the public starts to question liberalism and the progressive agenda of President Obama .... the press, unions, academia, Hollywood, etc. will be deserting the President in a flash. In their mind .... the ideology is more important than any one man, and if threatened .... that 'man' is expendable.